Platform
Qualify evidence. Evaluate policy. Preserve the decision basis.
GoSentrix sits between the tools that produce signals and the release decisions that depend on them, and preserves the evidence and reasoning behind every qualified decision.
Verification lifecycle
Signals enter as unverified claims. Each stage below qualifies them further before an explicit decision is preserved.
Signal
Claim
Qualified evidence
Policy evaluation
Decision
Review record
Enforcement
Enforcement is introduced only after a release path has been qualified through an Evidence Readiness Assessment. The entry criteria are measurable and customer-defined.
Qualified paths only
Enforcement is gated on completed Evidence Readiness Assessment and defined entry criteria.
Explicit outcomes
Proceed, Stop, Escalate, or Require authorization. No hidden downgrades.
Escalation by default
Insufficient evidence escalates rather than silently allowing the action.
Decision records
Every consequential decision carries the inputs required to understand and reproduce it later.
| Field | What it preserves |
|---|---|
| decision_id | Identifier for the decision record |
| policy_version | The policy version active at decision time |
| evidence_snapshot | The qualified evidence that entered the policy evaluation |
| freshness_state | When each piece of evidence was last observed |
| outcome | Proceed, Stop, Escalate, or Require authorization |
| downgrade_reason | Why authority was narrowed if required proof was missing |
| reasoning | The policy rules and evidence that produced the outcome |
Illustrative decision record
Synthetic example- Decision
- Escalate
- Evidence state
- Insufficient proof
- Policy version
- Release policy v3
- Inputs
- scanner finding, ticket state, CI result, reviewer note
- Basis preserved
- Yes
Cryptographic signing and content-addressing are architecture targets, not field-proven claims.
What the platform is made of
Evidence qualification
Takes scanner output, test results, change records, and AI-agent claims as unverified inputs and qualifies them against source, freshness, and corroboration rules.
Policy evaluation
Evaluates qualified evidence against the active policy version for the release path.
Explicit outcomes
Emits Proceed, Stop, Escalate, or Require authorization based on the policy evaluation.
Decision history
Preserves the evidence, policy version, and reasoning behind each consequential decision.
Console
Where security, platform, and engineering leaders review decisions, evidence trails, and history.
Connectors
Pull signals from existing scanners, test systems, CI/CD platforms, and workflow tools.
What GoSentrix does, and what it doesn't.
Inputs GoSentrix qualifies
- SAST, DAST, SCA, container, and IaC scanner output
- AI coding and review agent output
- Test and CI/CD results
- Ticketing and workflow state
Outputs GoSentrix produces
- Evidence qualification records
- Policy evaluation outcomes
- Decision-history records
- Escalation and downgrade records
Controlled pilot
Controlled pilot: reducing release review from manual assertion to artifact-backed verification
A controlled pilot with anonymized participants tested whether release-evidence verification could replace manual review assertion with qualified, policy-bound evidence.
Starting condition
Release reviews relied on manual assertion: developers marked tickets closed, reviewers scanned checklists, and approvers relied on verbal assurance. Evidence was scattered across scanners, CI logs, ticketing systems, and chat threads.
What GoSentrix verified
Whether the evidence behind each release decision satisfied the customer’s versioned policy. We qualified scanner output, reviewer attestations, and AI-generated change records; flagged approvals unsupported by evidence; and preserved the reasoning for each verdict.
Artifacts produced
Policy-bound decision records, qualified evidence bundles, and explicit escalation notices for insufficient proof. Each record links the release candidate to the evidence evaluated and the policy version active at the time.
Time saved / manual review reduced
Reviewers spent less time reconstructing what had been checked. Instead of chasing evidence across systems, they reviewed a single, qualified evidence summary and the policy evaluation that followed.
Decision enabled
Proceed, stop, escalate, or require authorization — with a recorded basis. Teams could release with confidence when evidence satisfied policy, and escalate transparently when it did not.
Regulatory / security relevance
The preserved decision record supports audit requests, post-incident review, and regulated-release documentation. It shows what was known, what policy applied, and why the outcome followed.
What we do not claim
- Guaranteed incident prevention or risk reduction.
- Field-proven enforcement authority in every customer environment.
- That artifact-backed verification replaces human judgment.
- Customer outcomes; the pilot measures whether verification can reduce reliance on manual assertion, not whether it prevents breaches.
Read the full doctrine on what we will and will not claim.
Explore verification.
See how GoSentrix qualifies evidence, evaluates policy, and preserves the basis for your release decisions.