Resources
Release-evidence verification resources.
Doctrine, category explainers, guides, proof artifacts, and worked examples.
Start here
What is release-evidence verification?
The independent evidence layer between tools that generate claims and decisions that depend on those claims.
Verification Doctrine
The public operating doctrine for release-evidence verification: what we will and will not claim.
Glossary
Canonical definitions for release-evidence verification, proof artifacts, policy-version binding, and AI-generated code governance.
What is ASPM?
Application Security Posture Management explained, and how it relates to release-evidence verification.
Agentic AppSec
Govern AI-generated code, coding agents, and autonomous workflows with agent-neutral evidence.
Integrations
GitHub
Qualify repository, pull request, code-scanning, and CI workflow evidence for release decisions.
GitLab
Qualify merge request, pipeline, and repository evidence for release decisions.
Jira
Treat ticket and workflow state as a claim that must be corroborated by independent evidence.
Slack
Capture approval, escalation, and notification events as part of the decision record.
Cursor
Capture AI-generated change provenance from the Cursor coding agent for verification.
Claude Code
Capture AI-generated change provenance from Claude Code for independent verification.
Codex
Capture AI-generated change provenance from OpenAI Codex for independent verification.
GitHub Copilot
Capture AI-generated change provenance from GitHub Copilot for independent verification.
MCP servers
Capture Model Context Protocol tool calls and agent context as evidence inputs.
Release-evidence verification
What is release-evidence verification?
The independent evidence layer between tools that generate claims and decisions that depend on those claims.
Release-evidence verification glossary
Definitions for the terms GoSentrix uses to describe evidence-backed release decisions.
What is a security verification body?
An independent layer that evaluates whether evidence is strong enough to authorize a consequential security action.
Security verification body vs ASPM
A side-by-side comparison of evidence verification and Application Security Posture Management.
Verification Doctrine
The public operating doctrine for release-evidence verification: what we will and will not claim.
FAQ
Canonical answers about release-evidence verification, policy evaluation, and where GoSentrix stands today.
Evidence Readiness Assessment
Map how a qualified release decision is assembled today and define the criteria for continuous verification.
Illustrative release decision
A worked example of how GoSentrix qualifies evidence, evaluates policy, and produces an explicit release outcome.
ASPM and AppSec category explainers
What is ASPM?
Application Security Posture Management explained: what it is, what it is not, and how it relates to release-evidence verification.
ASPM vs security verification
ASPM platforms aggregate and prioritize risk. Security verification evaluates whether evidence satisfies policy.
ASPM vs vulnerability management
ASPM platforms prioritize application risk. Vulnerability management tracks known issues. GoSentrix verifies the evidence.
ASPM vs software supply chain security
ASPM manages application posture. Supply chain security secures dependencies, builds, and provenance.
ASPM vs CNAPP
ASPM focuses on application-layer risk. CNAPP focuses on cloud-native infrastructure and runtime.
ASPM vs SAST/SCA
SAST and SCA identify issues. ASPM prioritizes findings. GoSentrix verifies whether evidence supports a release decision.
Suppression vs disproval
Why silencing a finding is not the same as proving it no longer applies.
GoSentrix vs ASPM
ASPM helps security teams determine what to investigate and remediate. GoSentrix determines whether the evidence satisfies policy.
AI-speed software delivery
What is agentic application security?
Governance for AI-generated code, coding agents, autonomous fixes, and vibe coding security.
MCP governance
Govern Model Context Protocol servers and the AI agents that access them.
What is an AI-BOM?
AI bill of materials: provenance records for models, prompts, agents, and generated artifacts.
AI code provenance
Provenance records for AI-generated changes, from model and prompt to commit and release.
AI code lineage
Preserve AI code lineage so teams can verify the provenance of AI-generated changes before release.
Validated autonomous remediation
Autonomous fixes are only as strong as the evidence that proves they worked.
How to secure AI-generated code
Capture provenance, cap AI claims at the evidence level, and verify AI-generated changes before release.
Remediation proof and runtime context
How to prove a vulnerability was fixed
Move from ticket closure to verified remediation evidence using independent corroboration.
How to prove vulnerabilities were fixed
Move from ticket closure to verified remediation evidence using independent corroboration.
Runtime context for AppSec prioritization
Use runtime evidence to prioritize vulnerabilities, validate fixes, and show risk was retired.
Merge readiness
Determine whether the evidence behind a merge request satisfies customer-defined policy.
Proof artifacts
Sample decision artifact
A synthetic example of a release-decision artifact: evidence, policy version, and outcome.
Sample Pipeline BOM
A synthetic example of a Pipeline BOM showing artifact provenance and build evidence.
Sample replay command
A synthetic example showing how a release decision can be replayed from preserved evidence.
Sample verified remediation record
A synthetic example of a remediation record with independent corroboration.
Research
Security claim to evidence gap
A research note on how often security claims lack corroborating evidence.
Ticket closure vs verified remediation
A research note comparing closed tickets with independently verified fixes.
AI-generated code verification benchmark
A research note on verifying AI-generated code claims before release.
Alternatives
Side-by-side comparisons with adjacent tools and platforms.