Built from a decade inside one of the world's most attacked payment networks.
GoSentrix was founded by Swapnil Deshmukh, an application-security operator with 17 years of experience, including a decade at Visa.
The problem we saw
Across software security work — including a decade at Visa, co-authoring Hacking Exposed Mobile, and writing The Definitive Guide to Application Security Posture Management — the same conversation repeated:
- "Which of these findings actually block the release?"
- "Did the fix actually remove the risk?"
- "Can we prove why this release was cleared?"
- "Who approved this exception, and on what evidence?"
The modern SDLC produces more security claims than any team can validate by hand. But release decisions still relied on scattered evidence, verbal assurances, and tickets that said "fixed" without proof.
Software security was not broken because tools were weak. It was broken because the evidence behind release decisions was fragmented, unreproducible, and hard to defend.
What we are building
GoSentrix is a release-evidence verification layer for consequential software delivery. It determines whether critical remediation satisfies company policy before software ships — and preserves the basis for every qualified release decision.
From first principles:
- Evidence can be uncertain; policy evaluation must be reproducible.
- Insufficient evidence must be escalated, not silently allowed.
- Every consequential decision must carry its evidence and policy version with it.
- Claims about our own capability must meet the same evidence standard we apply to customer findings.
Our mission
To give organizations defensible release decisions — by qualifying evidence against customer-defined policy, escalating insufficient proof, and preserving the basis for every qualified decision.
Assess one consequential release path.
Map how release decisions are made today, identify missing evidence, and define the criteria for continuous verification.