Skip to content

Glossary

Suppression vs disproval

Suppression hides or accepts a finding for workflow purposes; disproval provides evidence that the finding is invalid in the evaluated context.

Definition

Suppression hides or accepts a finding for workflow purposes. Disproval provides evidence that the finding is invalid in the evaluated context. The distinction prevents ignored findings from being misrepresented as proven false.

A suppressed finding remains a risk until disproven. A disproven finding has evidence showing it does not apply.

Why it matters

It prevents ignored findings from being misrepresented as proven false. Suppression without disproval is a common way risk is silently accepted.

Example

A SAST finding is marked "won't fix" with no evidence. That is suppression. A disproval would include reachability analysis showing the function is unreachable or a policy exception recording why the finding is invalid.

Related terms

  • Evidence ladderA governed sequence of evidence states that prevents raw signals from being treated as proof.
  • Verified remediationConfirmation, through qualified evidence, that a claimed fix removed or neutralized the specific risk being evaluated.
  • Vulnerability fix proofIndependent evidence that a reported vulnerability no longer applies to the release candidate.

See also